Exposing the Link: James Hind and Alex Jones.

Following the evidence connecting Project Night Watch, Castle Corbenic and the identity question.

Where is the proof connecting Castle Corbenic, Alex Jones and James Hind? That is the question I intend to address in this article by examining the connections between the names, organisations and public statements involved.

Rather than relying on speculation, I will set out the evidence as I understand it, explain how the various connections fit together, and invite readers to examine the material for themselves.

1. Establishing the connection between James Hind and Project Night Watch.

Before examining the connection between Alex Jones of Colchester and James Hind, it is necessary to establish the relationship between James Hind and Project Night Watch (PNW).

The first piece of evidence is a screenshot in which James Hind associates himself with Project Night Watch. In another exchange, Project Night Watch instructs me to stop referring to the organisation as James Hind and instead address it as PNW.


The wording is significant. The statement that “Project Night Watch now acts as the group” appears to describe a relationship between the James Hind identity and the organisation operating under the Project Night Watch name.

I have also stated that the James Hind identity was created and maintained by List 616. The screenshots and associated material are central to the argument I am presenting.

In my assessment, this evidence establishes a substantial connection between James Hind and Project Night Watch. I maintain that the connection has never been satisfactorily disputed.

But what does that tell us about Alex Jones?

That is where the next part of the evidence becomes important.

2. Connecting Project Night Watch with Alex Jones.

Alex Jones, based in Colchester, is associated with Castle Corbenic Limited. He has also publicly identified himself as a director or chief executive of Project Night Watch Limited.

The acknowledgement by Alex Jones that he holds a leadership role in Project Night Watch is a key part of this investigation. It provides a direct link between him and the organisation previously associated with James Hind.

The question, therefore, is whether the Project Night Watch referred to by James Hind is the same organisation associated with Alex Jones.

To explore that question, we must consider the public statements and documentary material together.

3. The Halloween 2023 statement.

One particularly relevant item is a post attributed to James Hind and dated 31 October 2023.

In that post, James Hind refers to involvement in the Hoaxtead community and an association with what he describes as the grey faction of the Satanic Temple. He then makes the following statement:

“My own group eventually would become Project Night Watch.”

This is an important statement in the timeline because it appears to describe the development of a group into Project Night Watch.

If the post is authentic and its authorship is correctly attributed, it supports the argument that the James Hind identity was associated with the formation or development of Project Night Watch.

The next question is whether that organisation can be connected to Alex Jones.

4. Could there be two Project Night Watch organisations?

One possible objection deserves consideration: could there be two separate organisations operating under the name Project Night Watch?

Names alone cannot settle that question. Nor should readers assume that two references to Project Night Watch necessarily concern the same legal entity.

However, I point to links supplied by both Project Night Watch and Alex Jones that lead to the same website. In my view, this is an important detail because it provides a common point of reference between the organisation described in the James Hind material and the organisation associated with Alex Jones.

When considered alongside the statements attributed to James Hind and Alex Jones's own acknowledgement of his role in Project Night Watch, this shared online connection strengthens the case for examining whether the references concern the same organisation.

The question is no longer simply about two names appearing in isolation. It is about whether the available evidence forms a consistent and verifiable chain.

5. The cease-and-desist letter of December 2025.

Another significant document is a cease-and-desist letter that I say I personally received from Alex Jones on 29 December 2025.

According to my account, the letter identifies Alex Jones as a director of Project Night Watch Limited.

This is relevant because it provides documentary evidence of the connection between Alex Jones and Project Night Watch, rather than relying solely on social media posts or third-party commentary.

The letter should be considered alongside the earlier material attributed to James Hind. Taken together, these documents provide the basis for the connection I am investigating.

However, the letter establishes the connection between Alex Jones and Project Night Watch; the separate question of whether Alex Jones and James Hind are the same person requires evidence directly addressing identity.

6. Alex Jones's October 2026 statement

The timeline continues with a YouTube Community post that I attribute to Alex Jones, dated Sunday, 25 October 2026.

In that post, Jones reportedly stated:

“When I founded Project Night Watch Ltd, I had already decided that the brand and products of the business would have some link to the doctor's grave.”

This statement is relevant because it expressly refers to the founding of Project Night Watch Limited and describes the thinking behind the business's branding and products.

It provides another point of comparison with the earlier statement attributed to James Hind that his own group would eventually become Project Night Watch.

The chronology is worth examining: a statement attributed to James Hind describes a group becoming Project Night Watch, while Alex Jones subsequently describes founding Project Night Watch Limited.

Whether these statements establish common identity depends on the authenticity, context and corroboration of the underlying material. Nevertheless, they form part of the evidence I believe warrants further scrutiny.

7. Bringing the evidence together.

The case I am presenting rests on several connected strands of evidence:

  • James Hind and Project Night Watch: screenshots and statements that I say associate the James Hind identity with PNW.

  • Alex Jones and Project Night Watch: public acknowledgements identifying Jones with the organisation.

  • The shared website: a common online destination that I believe links the references to the same Project Night Watch.

  • The December 2025 letter: correspondence that I say identifies Jones as a director of Project Night Watch Limited.

  • The October 2026 post: a statement attributed to Jones discussing the founding of Project Night Watch Limited.

Individually, these items establish different parts of the picture. Collectively, they provide the basis for the questions I am raising about the relationship between James Hind, Project Night Watch and Alex Jones.

The crucial distinction is that establishing an individual's connection to an organisation is not, by itself, conclusive proof that the individual is also responsible for a particular online identity. That final step requires evidence that directly connects the person to the identity in question.

8. The unanswered question.

My conclusion is that the connections outlined above warrant serious examination. I believe the available material supports a strong case for investigating whether James Hind and Alex Jones are the same person.

I also believe that the public statements, shared online references and correspondence deserve to be considered together rather than dismissed individually.

There is, however, a straightforward way to resolve the central question: examine the original documents, verify their authenticity, establish the legal identity of the relevant Project Night Watch entity, and look for direct evidence connecting Alex Jones to the James Hind identity.

The question remains: what evidence would definitively establish whether James Hind and Alex Jones are one and the same?

I invite readers to examine the material, assess the connections for themselves, and distinguish what the documents demonstrably establish from what remains to be proven.

The material discussed here represents only a portion of the evidence I say is available in the public domain. Further documents may provide additional context and help clarify the relationship between these names and organisations.

The purpose of this article is to set out the evidence, explain the questions it raises, and encourage a closer examination of the facts.


Published for the purposes of the detection and prevention of crime.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Representation Raises Questions.

Image
  Sometimes the most interesting questions arise not from what people openly say, but from the connections between people, organisations and events. In this case, an individual who now operates publicly as a senior executive of a number of companies has stated that he represents another individual and acts on that person's behalf. That declaration of representation naturally creates an association between the two. There is, however, a further layer to the story. The representative first became known to a wider online audience in January 2026, having previously operated under another name. The person behind that earlier identity openly described themselves as a Satanist and made no apparent attempt to conceal that particular aspect of their online persona. The individual now operating under their present identity has not publicly admitted that they were the person behind the earlier account. Nevertheless, there are circumstances which raise questions about whether the two identities...
Read more

Alex Jones Statement Refers to Six People as “Stalkers”

Image
Alex Jones, CEO of Castle Corbenic Ltd and Project Night Watch Ltd, has published a statement on his YouTube Community page referring to what he described as “six of my stalkers.” In the statement, Jones named or was understood to be referring to Kaley Einav, Jake Clarke, Justin Pomeroy, Shellie Mote, Katie Boyle and Matt Taylor . Jones wrote: “All six of my stalkers are either directly involved or supporting networks and individuals who have wanted to kidnap children, traffick them overseas and exploit them for money, including the children of my client. “Be under no illusion that these stalkers are evil people who are prepared to do extreme harm to children and vulnerable people for the purposes of personal gain.” The statement therefore makes extremely serious allegations concerning the six people referred to. No evidence establishing those allegations has been presented in the statement itself, and the allegations should not be treated as findings of fact or criminal convictions. M...
Read more

Taylor Investigations#1 - Hopkins/Jones Connection

Image
Alex Jones boasts of reporting me to police on 3 occasions in connection with XXXXXX. “Note 01: three reports were made to Sussex Police by me against Taylor in relation to the Lofthouse matter.” Extract from his YouTube channel community post Fri 25 Sep 26. On top of admitting to another top, he doesn’t remember what it was about, because he’s lost count of the number of times he’s reported me to Sussex police. “The person called Matthew Taylor of Brighton previously was convicted in relation to online harm he did to the client I represent.  This same Taylor was subject to a report by me to Sussex Police as a result of online postings I became aware of against my client, for which I supplied a witness statement.  At around the same time as this was going on, I became aware of online postings by Taylor against XXXXXX, and these I also reported to Sussex Police.  I supplied another witness statement for something to Sussex Police, but I cannot remember for what that was fo...
Read more