Taylor Investigations#1 - Hopkins/Jones Connection

Alex Jones boasts of reporting me to police on 3 occasions in connection with XXXXXX.

“Note 01: three reports were made to Sussex Police by me against Taylor in relation to the Lofthouse matter.”


Extract from his YouTube channel community post Fri 25 Sep 26.


On top of admitting to another top, he doesn’t remember what it was about, because he’s lost count of the number of times he’s reported me to Sussex police.


“The person called Matthew Taylor of Brighton previously was convicted in relation to online harm he did to the client I represent.  This same Taylor was subject to a report by me to Sussex Police as a result of online postings I became aware of against my client, for which I supplied a witness statement.  At around the same time as this was going on, I became aware of online postings by Taylor against XXXXXX, and these I also reported to Sussex Police.  I supplied another witness statement for something to Sussex Police, but I cannot remember for what that was for.  I have quite a few references and communications on record with Sussex Police in relation to Taylor.”


Extract from his YouTube channel community post Fri 25 Sep 26.


By stating to have reported me 3 times to police over XXXXXX, Alex Jones has once again shown himself to be James Hind.


The dates of these reports and their digital files prove it to be true.


PC Oliver Taylor connects with PC Scott to exchange their findings.


Insert email addresses


Matthew Hopkins, using the online handle of The Witchfinder General, publishes an email from Sussex Police conceding he isn’t James Hind, and further reveals Sussex Police had contacted James Hind and asked him to stop blogging about a certain active case, because of the danger of prejudicing it.


“At almost the same time, a few weeks ago, police in Brighton contacted Simon Just because he had been wrongly accused of being the operator of PNW and they wanted the account to shut up about a case they were working on to avoid prejudicing it.”









Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Exposing the Link: James Hind and Alex Jones.

Image
Following the evidence connecting Project Night Watch, Castle Corbenic and the identity question. Where is the proof connecting Castle Corbenic, Alex Jones and James Hind? That is the question I intend to address in this article by examining the connections between the names, organisations and public statements involved. Rather than relying on speculation, I will set out the evidence as I understand it, explain how the various connections fit together, and invite readers to examine the material for themselves. 1. Establishing the connection between James Hind and Project Night Watch. Before examining the connection between Alex Jones of Colchester and James Hind, it is necessary to establish the relationship between James Hind and Project Night Watch (PNW). The first piece of evidence is a screenshot in which James Hind associates himself with Project Night Watch. In another exchange, Project Night Watch instructs me to stop referring to the organisation as James Hind and instead addr...
Read more

Alex Jones Statement Refers to Six People as “Stalkers”

Image
Alex Jones, CEO of Castle Corbenic Ltd and Project Night Watch Ltd, has published a statement on his YouTube Community page referring to what he described as “six of my stalkers.” In the statement, Jones named or was understood to be referring to Kaley Einav, Jake Clarke, Justin Pomeroy, Shellie Mote, Katie Boyle and Matt Taylor . Jones wrote: “All six of my stalkers are either directly involved or supporting networks and individuals who have wanted to kidnap children, traffick them overseas and exploit them for money, including the children of my client. “Be under no illusion that these stalkers are evil people who are prepared to do extreme harm to children and vulnerable people for the purposes of personal gain.” The statement therefore makes extremely serious allegations concerning the six people referred to. No evidence establishing those allegations has been presented in the statement itself, and the allegations should not be treated as findings of fact or criminal convictions. M...
Read more

When Representation Raises Questions.

Image
  Sometimes the most interesting questions arise not from what people openly say, but from the connections between people, organisations and events. In this case, an individual who now operates publicly as a senior executive of a number of companies has stated that he represents another individual and acts on that person's behalf. That declaration of representation naturally creates an association between the two. There is, however, a further layer to the story. The representative first became known to a wider online audience in January 2026, having previously operated under another name. The person behind that earlier identity openly described themselves as a Satanist and made no apparent attempt to conceal that particular aspect of their online persona. The individual now operating under their present identity has not publicly admitted that they were the person behind the earlier account. Nevertheless, there are circumstances which raise questions about whether the two identities...
Read more